In the case of intergovernmental or foreign trade, the United States Arbitration Act of 1925 makes the agreement legally applicable, and most states have similar laws for agreements that are not covered by federal law. When a court is asked to reconsider a decision, it can only hear complaints about the basic procedural fairness or the conduct of the arbitrator, not the merits of the case. One of the best things about ADR is that it offers opportunities for managers and lawyers to be creative. Disputes and most conflicting transaction negotiations are based exclusively on a legalistic dollar valuation. With the active involvement of management, ADR facilitates the perception of dispute resolution as a business issue and the study of business solutions. Think about it: what happens if you don`t reach an agreement? Some observers argue that SJT is not well suited to very complex cases, as it requires more jury training than the procedure can begin. But in June 1989, SJT led to the decision to bring a $300 million class action against the National Lead Company and the Department of Energy by a group of 14,000 plaintiffs in a case involving the release of uranium waste into the atmosphere in Fernald, Ohio. Due to the complexity of the case, the LSU lasted ten days instead of the usual 1 or 2 days, but litigation and appeals could have lasted months or years. The summary jury returned a verdict of $136 million, including punitive damages, and the two sides agreed shortly thereafter on $73 million, when previous negotiations were at a complete stalemate. The conditions for possible regulation will be specific to the circumstances of each dispute, but there are a few key points that apply to each transaction solution and which, in addition to the aforementioned legal requirements, should be carefully considered to ensure that the agreement clearly and explicitly addresses all the details of the proposed agreement: large differences in the financial resources of opposing companies can sometimes have perverse effects on comparison efforts. The weaker party may want the protection of a formal judicial procedure and less likely to trust the ADR. A method under judicial supervision such as SJT can reduce this type of nervousness, as well as the involvement of a sponsorship arbitration organization and an arbitrator.